<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>UneIT &#187; ICH performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneit.com/tag/ich-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneit.com</link>
	<description>News, Views, Tips, and Talks upon IT around the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 13:04:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Performance Faceoff: ICH 9R versus ICH 10R</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2008/08/28/performance-faceoff-ich-9r-versus-ich-10r/</link>
		<comments>http://uneit.com/2008/08/28/performance-faceoff-ich-9r-versus-ich-10r/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Silver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Product Info]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICH performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2008/08/28/performance-faceoff-ich-9r-versus-ich-10r/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I found a test about the performance between ICH 9R and ICH 10R. Very interesting while surprising. Have a look. main hardware configuration: Seagate ES.2 250GX4 Raid 0 DRAM: DDR2 1000 2GBX4 ICH 9R: ICH 10R: Seemingly, ICH 9R enjoys undeniable advantage. Is it due to firmware/software immaturity or the fact that ICH 10R [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://uneit.com/2008/08/28/performance-faceoff-ich-9r-versus-ich-10r/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.259 seconds -->

