<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>UneIT &#187; AMD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneit.com/tag/amd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneit.com</link>
	<description>News, Views, Tips, and Talks upon IT around the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 12:14:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>AMD Postponed 32nm Products</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2009/03/07/amd-postponed-32nm-products/</link>
		<comments>http://uneit.com/2009/03/07/amd-postponed-32nm-products/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 15:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Silver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Product Info]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2009/03/07/amd-postponed-32nm-products/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Weeks ago, the industry learnt about Intel’s great ahead-of-time advance in 32nm technology, which will shift Intel’s 32nm products from the original 2010 timeframe to Q4 in 2009. While many people may expect AMD to catch up, AMD’s Damon Muzny had confirmed publicly that their 32nm products based on architecture “Bulldozer” will be postponed to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://uneit.com/2009/03/07/amd-postponed-32nm-products/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overcount Your CPU from AMD</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2009/02/23/overcount-your-cpu-from-amd/</link>
		<comments>http://uneit.com/2009/02/23/overcount-your-cpu-from-amd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Silver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Product Info]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2009/02/23/overcount-your-cpu-from-amd/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reported first by VR-Zone and spread wildly like fire around the world, lots of people now know that a certain type of CPU from AMD that shipped with triple cores can be restored to its origin, a quad. Users of Phenom II X3 are wildly excited with this info and had been trying to work [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://uneit.com/2009/02/23/overcount-your-cpu-from-amd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD Phenom II Highly Overclocked</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2009/02/10/amd-phenom-ii-highly-overclocked/</link>
		<comments>http://uneit.com/2009/02/10/amd-phenom-ii-highly-overclocked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Silver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Product News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2009/02/10/amd-phenom-ii-highly-overclocked/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Believe it or not, one post in Coolaler forum caught my attention with the author claiming he had overclocked the newly released AMD Phenom II to an unbelievably high clock, 6272MHz… Check it in CPU-Z’s database here: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=503861 The author also claimed he had passed Super-Pi test while forgot to write down the result or [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://uneit.com/2009/02/10/amd-phenom-ii-highly-overclocked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.587 seconds -->
