<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel Core i7 940 in Real Test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/</link>
	<description>News, Views, Tips, and Talks upon IT around the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:49:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gostixel</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/comment-page-1/#comment-940</link>
		<dc:creator>Gostixel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 09:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/#comment-940</guid>
		<description>Да,несогласен с предыдущими блоггерами 
) Bye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Да,несогласен с предыдущими блоггерами<br />
) Bye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Babylya</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/comment-page-1/#comment-935</link>
		<dc:creator>Babylya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 05:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/#comment-935</guid>
		<description>Хм,несогласен с предыдущими блоггерами 
) :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Хм,несогласен с предыдущими блоггерами<br />
) <img src='http://uneit.com/xpres/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/comment-page-1/#comment-850</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/#comment-850</guid>
		<description>Интель со своим и7 сливает по полной...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Интель со своим и7 сливает по полной&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Protoplastus</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/comment-page-1/#comment-634</link>
		<dc:creator>Protoplastus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 12:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/#comment-634</guid>
		<description>Не слабо по русски.
Слишком уж стоит он прилично + надо менять мать и память ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Не слабо по русски.<br />
Слишком уж стоит он прилично + надо менять мать и память &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DimMan</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/comment-page-1/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>DimMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 06:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/#comment-569</guid>
		<description>Народ, а по русски слабо!!
чудики, Intel rulez, but you suck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Народ, а по русски слабо!!<br />
чудики, Intel rulez, but you suck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 in Real-Life Apps - Xtreme CPU</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/comment-page-1/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 in Real-Life Apps - Xtreme CPU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 02:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/#comment-183</guid>
		<description>[...] some people forget the results someone got last week about Nehalem which were posted on this site.  Intel Core i7 940 in Real TestbyUneIT    __________________ Did I hit you in a former life with a Mack Truck Gigabyte EP45-DS3L w Intel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some people forget the results someone got last week about Nehalem which were posted on this site.  Intel Core i7 940 in Real TestbyUneIT    __________________ Did I hit you in a former life with a Mack Truck Gigabyte EP45-DS3L w Intel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: handlandj</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>handlandj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 21:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/#comment-173</guid>
		<description>no, it is underclocked for a fair competition at the same speed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no, it is underclocked for a fair competition at the same speed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @wut</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/comment-page-1/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>@wut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/#comment-165</guid>
		<description>@wut
&quot;people might forget that the older QX9770 would end up costing around $500 more than the new i7 940…….

maybe remind them?&quot;

The $999 tag posted is the 1000 unit tray cost without packaging, you can expect to see a rather large price bump when they are sold to consumers. It will likely be about the same as the QX9770, around $1500.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@wut<br />
&#8220;people might forget that the older QX9770 would end up costing around $500 more than the new i7 940…….</p>
<p>maybe remind them?&#8221;</p>
<p>The $999 tag posted is the 1000 unit tray cost without packaging, you can expect to see a rather large price bump when they are sold to consumers. It will likely be about the same as the QX9770, around $1500.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soundguy</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Soundguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/#comment-158</guid>
		<description>uh, the QX9775 is the skulltrail chip, as it is socket 771, the QX9770 a is socket 775 extreme chip with a stock speed of 3.2, where have you gotten 2.93 from? is that supposed to be a QX9650? i&#039;m confused...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uh, the QX9775 is the skulltrail chip, as it is socket 771, the QX9770 a is socket 775 extreme chip with a stock speed of 3.2, where have you gotten 2.93 from? is that supposed to be a QX9650? i&#8217;m confused&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xNecrunx</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>xNecrunx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 07:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/#comment-153</guid>
		<description>This new intel core i7 they said is only a 20% bump from the old processors, and if you see how much would it take to have one of those CPU? well lets see a brand new motherboard normally they will be selling it at 350$ i mean if you have a core to quad right now, would not make much of a diference to go to core i7, I just know i would wait for some good coolers come out and when the prices drop so i can overclock this corei7 to 4.0ghz now that would be better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This new intel core i7 they said is only a 20% bump from the old processors, and if you see how much would it take to have one of those CPU? well lets see a brand new motherboard normally they will be selling it at 350$ i mean if you have a core to quad right now, would not make much of a diference to go to core i7, I just know i would wait for some good coolers come out and when the prices drop so i can overclock this corei7 to 4.0ghz now that would be better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LatinLegacy</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>LatinLegacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/#comment-149</guid>
		<description>It will be a good processor regardless. People always seem to completely overlook the fact that this test is in the Ic7s very early life cycle. These benchmarks, impressive or not, should be taken with a grain of salt. Only the highly inexperience enthusiast, aka people like &quot; gamerk2 &quot; would make a comment as he did. This is an entirely new architecture so we all should know nothing about this benchmark setup was optimized to take full advantage of the CPU. Wait until it hits the retail market where you&#039;ll have your ASUS, Abit, DFI, etc X58 Boards that will really show what this CPU is capable of. It will be the same scenario the Core 2 family went through. They will just keep getting better the more they are pushed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be a good processor regardless. People always seem to completely overlook the fact that this test is in the Ic7s very early life cycle. These benchmarks, impressive or not, should be taken with a grain of salt. Only the highly inexperience enthusiast, aka people like &#8221; gamerk2 &#8221; would make a comment as he did. This is an entirely new architecture so we all should know nothing about this benchmark setup was optimized to take full advantage of the CPU. Wait until it hits the retail market where you&#8217;ll have your ASUS, Abit, DFI, etc X58 Boards that will really show what this CPU is capable of. It will be the same scenario the Core 2 family went through. They will just keep getting better the more they are pushed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wut</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>wut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 01:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/#comment-144</guid>
		<description>people might forget that the older QX9770 would end up costing around $500 more than the new i7 940.......

maybe remind them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>people might forget that the older QX9770 would end up costing around $500 more than the new i7 940&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>maybe remind them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silver</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Silver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/#comment-142</guid>
		<description>I think you guys would be interested by this, http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/a-little-test-of-intel-core-i7s-overclockability/ , Core i7 is never that hard to overclock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you guys would be interested by this, <a href="http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/a-little-test-of-intel-core-i7s-overclockability/" rel="nofollow">http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/a-little-test-of-intel-core-i7s-overclockability/</a> , Core i7 is never that hard to overclock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>I cant wait to see the i7 Extreme at 3.2GHz take on the QX9770 at 3.2GHz, that would be a much better point of comparison. Right now the mid range is slightly less than yester-year&#039;s top of the line, but that is expected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant wait to see the i7 Extreme at 3.2GHz take on the QX9770 at 3.2GHz, that would be a much better point of comparison. Right now the mid range is slightly less than yester-year&#8217;s top of the line, but that is expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/#comment-139</guid>
		<description>First of all, when a game drops frames because of the CPU, it doesn&#039;t mean that it is slower in any respect. It just means that it is less efficient. Furthermore games are just starting to get into being designed for two threads, let alone 4, or now with the Nehalem, 8 threads. This is a power chip. Look at WinRAR for example. it DOUBLED its decompression over the Core 2 Quad Extreme. Look at 3dMark Vantage CPU scores and Cinebench. This chip is more then powerful, its a beast. It depends on what application your applying it to. Show me a game that can take advantage of 8 separate threads and then test it. I&#039;m sure the video card is going to be a bottleneck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, when a game drops frames because of the CPU, it doesn&#8217;t mean that it is slower in any respect. It just means that it is less efficient. Furthermore games are just starting to get into being designed for two threads, let alone 4, or now with the Nehalem, 8 threads. This is a power chip. Look at WinRAR for example. it DOUBLED its decompression over the Core 2 Quad Extreme. Look at 3dMark Vantage CPU scores and Cinebench. This chip is more then powerful, its a beast. It depends on what application your applying it to. Show me a game that can take advantage of 8 separate threads and then test it. I&#8217;m sure the video card is going to be a bottleneck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: realdeal</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>realdeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 06:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/#comment-137</guid>
		<description>the only game i7 wins is world in conflict , by 4 frames , lol
and i don&#039;t even play &quot;world in conflict&quot;
we&#039;re better of with core 2 duo 8400/8500 and the likes....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the only game i7 wins is world in conflict , by 4 frames , lol<br />
and i don&#8217;t even play &#8220;world in conflict&#8221;<br />
we&#8217;re better of with core 2 duo 8400/8500 and the likes&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/#comment-136</guid>
		<description>You do know that&#039;s the mid range Core I7 Nehalem, that&#039;s not the extreme edition in which the QX9770 is which is the chips used for the Skulltrail system. So your logic is a little off in which I think that your qx9650 cost more then this new Nehalem that&#039;s coming out. Even after markup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do know that&#8217;s the mid range Core I7 Nehalem, that&#8217;s not the extreme edition in which the QX9770 is which is the chips used for the Skulltrail system. So your logic is a little off in which I think that your qx9650 cost more then this new Nehalem that&#8217;s coming out. Even after markup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmy</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/#comment-135</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wait to get Core i7 and build a rig with it. Future proofing ;)

Superlinear scaling on Cinebench? What else does Intel have in store for AMD?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait to get Core i7 and build a rig with it. Future proofing <img src='http://uneit.com/xpres/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Superlinear scaling on Cinebench? What else does Intel have in store for AMD?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gamerk2</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>gamerk2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/#comment-134</guid>
		<description>So, a cheaper Quad still beat i7 in gaming in most instances, and theres not that much seperation either way...and thats with the advantage of better use of DDR3 RAM, due to the removal of the FSB...

Thanks, but no thanks.  Ill stick with my QX9650.  I see no reason whatsover to upgrade if you already have a quad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, a cheaper Quad still beat i7 in gaming in most instances, and theres not that much seperation either way&#8230;and thats with the advantage of better use of DDR3 RAM, due to the removal of the FSB&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks, but no thanks.  Ill stick with my QX9650.  I see no reason whatsover to upgrade if you already have a quad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silver</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Silver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Why does Intel suck? It&#039;s beyond my comprehension. I mean, all of the fastest cores in the world now are from Intel. Not a single one is from AMD. 

Intel is just in a competition with itself, between being better and much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does Intel suck? It&#8217;s beyond my comprehension. I mean, all of the fastest cores in the world now are from Intel. Not a single one is from AMD. </p>
<p>Intel is just in a competition with itself, between being better and much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crap</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>crap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 09:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/#comment-132</guid>
		<description>LOL intel suck hard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL intel suck hard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UneIT - Intel Core i7 940 in Real Test - Xtreme CPU</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>UneIT - Intel Core i7 940 in Real Test - Xtreme CPU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 07:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>[...] - Intel Core i7 940 in Real Test      Intel Core i7 940 in Real TestbyUneIT          More on the website.    __________________  WIP Gaming Rig: Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 @ 3.87 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; Intel Core i7 940 in Real Test      Intel Core i7 940 in Real TestbyUneIT          More on the website.    __________________  WIP Gaming Rig: Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 @ 3.87 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneit.com/2008/09/24/intel-core-i7-940-in-real-test/#comment-123</guid>
		<description>Man! I gotta have one! To touch on the future as you have said. LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man! I gotta have one! To touch on the future as you have said. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.979 seconds -->
